This article addresses the phenomenon of patriotic discourse, examining it as an independent subject of study within the field of political science. The primary focus is on clarifying the conceptual framework, which includes such categories as “discourse”, “political discourse”, and “patriotic discourse”. The necessity of a clear theoretical distinction between these phenomena is emphasized: political discourse functions as a broad communicative practice encompassing various forms of verbal and symbolic interaction, whereas patriotic discourse manifests as a specific type, relying on rhetoric of national identity, ideas of loyalty to the homeland, the defense of state interests, collective memory, and the values of civic solidarity. The author points out that discourse should be understood not only as a linguistic construct or a set of speech practices, but also as a form of political action executed through speech, capable of influencing social processes, shaping public opinion, mobilizing civic communities, and reinforcing political power. Particular importance in the article is given to the category of “patriotism” which, despite its ideological orientation, retains enduring relevance in contemporary studies. It is considered a significant analytical tool for examining processes of state consolidation, civic mobilization, and the formation of political legitimacy. The author emphasizes that the study of patriotic discourse opens up opportunities for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underpinning public policy and political communication.
patriotic discourse; patriotism; political discourse; speech; communication processes; discourse analysis; political communication.